- #Basilisk ii add more memory mac os
- #Basilisk ii add more memory upgrade
- #Basilisk ii add more memory full
- #Basilisk ii add more memory mods
I have drafted a template for a drive bracket that is 11" long. You actually have 11.5 good inches of room behind any given CD-ROM installed in the face of the 950. Combine that with a 128 KB cache card, a nice SCSI disk array and a Thunder IVGX graphics card to get the fastest 68K Mac.
#Basilisk ii add more memory upgrade
I've seen some 100/0 upgrade cards advertised for Centris 650's, Quadra 610's, Quadra 700's and Quadra 900. When going beyond stock configurations things can get interesting. This configuration should be faster than a Quadra 800 and possibly a Quadra 840AV in some tasks. That machine was a Quadra 950 with a 128 KB L2 cache card (expandable to 512 KB) and a special SCSI controller on a PDS card. The Quadra 950 did have an interesting variant called the Work Group Server 95.
With some special mounts, it wouldn't surprise me if an additional 6 hard drives could fit into the case.
#Basilisk ii add more memory full
The case is a full sized tower, though there are only two 5.25" bays on the front (one used by the floppy). The Quadra 950 is the most expandable 68K Mac with five Nubus slots (the IIfx had six but no onboard video), two onboard SCSI channels, onboard Ethernet, and supported up to 256 MB of RAM. The Quadra 840AV has a faster processor and uses an even more advanced system controller than what is found on the Quadra 800. The Quadra 800 often edges out the Quadra 950 due to a faster system controller. It is followed by the Quadra 800 and then the Quadra 950. The Quadra 840AV is the fastest stock 68K Mac Apple made. Is better faster or is better more robust or what? Maybe the 840 AV is faster (stock), but the 950 is more robust, aka powerful (stock). The whole question of better needs to be boxed in a little as well.
Tha being said, I think a stock 840AV would be a better machine than a 950, but the addition of a 601 card, a good SCSI card and some A/V cards (such as a PAS16 and VVS) would tip the table in favor of 950 over an 840AV with comparable upgrades (but I would question why add the A/V cards to a machine that already has them).
#Basilisk ii add more memory mods
Just the sheer strength of the mobos original design.Ģ) For any two machines that have been pushed to the extent of their design limit by the addition of daughter cards, sound cards, CPU upgrades, and even clock chipping or bus speed tweaking and these mods must exist in the realm of reality (no theoretical hacks like me saying that I *could* put a G3 upgrade card in a 950 *if* I remapped the pin connectors to accept a Crssendo upgrade card).
This question should really be addressed with two parallel assumptions:ġ) Both machines (or an machine for that matter) is in stock condition with the singular exception of maxed-out RAM, but no 'cards' or CPU upgrades. There are so many upgrade options, like adding a 601 card to the 950 or the NuBus cards for improved sound/video/SCSI/etc. The SCSI question is moot when you consider that either machine could be equalized by adding a NuBus SCSI card, thus putting the bottle neck at the bus speed of the NuBus. It also included one Geoport, and sold for $3,550 U.S., which was inexpensive for what was, at the time, the fastest Mac ever.Ĭreated by Mactracker, Copyright 2001 - 2005 Ian Page However, it's 3210 DSP ran at a faster 66 MHz. Based on the 0 processor, and housed in a Quadra 800-style case, the 840AV included AV features similar to its younger sibling, the 660AV. History: The Quadra 840AV was the first 68040 Mac to break the 33 MHz barrier.
#Basilisk ii add more memory mac os
Original Mac OS: Mac OS 7.1 (System Enabler 088 v1.0) Weight and Dimensions (Metric): 11.5 kg., 35.6 cm H x 19.6 cm W x 40 cm D the only other 68K I know that takes that much is the SE/30, but that's only a 68030 16MHz.
0 kommentar(er)
